Member-only story

How the Obama Administration Has Politicized Justice: A Comprehensive Exposé

Jett Powell

·2.6k Followers· Follow

Published in How The Obama Administration Has Politicized Justice: Reflections On Politics Liberty And The State (Encounter Broadsides 7)

7 min read · 3 weeks before

182 View Claps

13 Respond

Save

Listen

How the Obama Administration has Politicized Justice: Reflections on Politics Liberty and the State (Encounter Broadsides 7)

How the Obama Administration has Politicized Justice: Reflections on Politics, Liberty, and the State (Encounter Broadsides Book 7)

by Andrew C McCarthy

4.2 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	169 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	48 pages

The Obama Administration's politicization of the American justice system represents a grave threat to our democracy and the rule of law. Through a systematic pattern of bias, selective prosecution, suppression of dissent, and civil liberties violations, the Obama Administration has undermined the integrity of our justice system and eroded public trust in its ability to deliver fair and impartial justice.

Bias in the Justice System

Under the Obama Administration, the Justice Department has repeatedly demonstrated a clear bias in its enforcement of the law. High-profile cases involving individuals or organizations opposed to the Administration's policies have been investigated and prosecuted with undue zeal, while similar cases involving individuals or organizations aligned with the Administration have been ignored or dismissed.

One striking example of this bias is the case of the Tea Party. In the wake of the 2010 midterm elections, the IRS launched a systematic campaign of harassment and intimidation against conservative non-profit organizations affiliated with the Tea Party movement. These organizations were subjected to unwarranted audits, delays in processing applications, and other forms of administrative retaliation.

In contrast, the Justice Department has exhibited a remarkable degree of leniency towards individuals and organizations aligned with the Obama Administration. For example, despite clear evidence of wrongng, the Administration has refused to prosecute numerous high-ranking officials involved in the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal.

Selective Prosecution

The Obama Administration has also engaged in a pattern of selective prosecution, targeting individuals and organizations opposed to its policies while ignoring those who support them. This has created a chilling effect on political dissent, making it increasingly difficult for critics of the Administration to express their views without fear of retribution.

A prime example of selective prosecution is the case of James O'Keefe, a conservative journalist who has exposed numerous cases of corruption and wrongng within the Obama Administration. O'Keefe has been subjected to multiple criminal investigations and prosecutions, despite the fact that his actions were clearly protected by the First Amendment.

At the same time, the Administration has refused to prosecute individuals and organizations who have engaged in similar or worse conduct in support of the Administration's policies. For example, the Justice Department has declined to prosecute Black Lives Matter activists who have engaged in violence and intimidation, despite the fact that such actions are clearly illegal.

Suppression of Dissent

The Obama Administration has also taken numerous steps to suppress dissent, making it increasingly difficult for critics of the Administration to express their views. This has been accomplished through a variety of means, including surveillance, intimidation, and censorship.

One of the most egregious examples of suppression of dissent is the National Security Agency's (NSA) massive surveillance program. This program has collected vast amounts of data on American citizens without their knowledge or consent, raising serious concerns about the erosion of privacy rights under the Obama Administration.

The Administration has also engaged in intimidation tactics against critics, including threats of prosecution and harassment by government agencies. For example, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has targeted conservative groups with audits and other forms of retaliation, while the Department of Justice has threatened to prosecute individuals who have leaked classified information.

In addition, the Obama Administration has sought to censor opposing viewpoints through the use of social media platforms. Critics of the Administration have been banned from participating in online discussions and their content has been removed from websites.

Civil Liberties Violations

The Obama Administration's politicization of justice has also led to numerous civil liberties violations. These violations include the use of excessive force, the denial of due process, and the arbitrary detention of individuals.

One of the most egregious examples of civil liberties violations under the Obama Administration is the use of deadly force against unarmed civilians. In 2014, Eric Garner, a 43-year-old African American man, was killed by a New York City police officer while being arrested for selling loose cigarettes. Garner was unarmed and had committed no violent crime. His death sparked widespread protests and outrage.

The Administration has also engaged in the arbitrary detention of individuals, including American citizens. In 2013, the Obama Administration authorized the indefinite detention of American citizens without charge or trial. This policy was challenged in court and ultimately overturned, but it remains a chilling example of the Administration's disregard for civil liberties.

The Obama Administration's politicization of justice has had a devastating impact on the American justice system. Through a systematic pattern of bias, selective prosecution, suppression of dissent, and civil liberties violations, the Administration has undermined the integrity of our justice system and eroded public trust in its ability to deliver fair and impartial justice.

The consequences of this politicization will be felt for years to come. The erosion of public trust in our justice system has made it more difficult to resolve conflicts peacefully and has created a climate of fear and distrust. The suppression of dissent has stifled free speech and made it more difficult for Americans to hold their government accountable.

It is essential that we take steps to restore the integrity of our justice system and rebuild public trust. We must hold those responsible for politicizing justice accountable and implement reforms to ensure that the justice system is fair and impartial for all.

Additional Resources

Judicial Watch: Poll: Obama Administration Biased Against GOP
TheBlaze: IRS Targeted Conservative Groups for Extra Scrutiny During 2012 Election Cycle, Report Finds
Washington Post: James O'Keefe's sting record includes deceptions and one felony conviction
New York Times: N.S.A. Collects Phone Records of Millions of Americans
ACLU: DOJ Investigation into IRS Targeting of Conservative Groups Inadequate
NPR:

How the Obama Administration has Politicized Justice: Reflections on Politics, Liberty, and the State (Encounter Broadsides Book 7)

by Andrew C McCarthy

4.2 out of 5